| 1. What is your role/title with biological databases? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Curator |  | 56.1% | 32 |
| Faculty/Group Leader | | 17.5% | 10 |
| Research scientist | | 8.8% | 5 |
| Postdoc | | 3.5% | 2 |
| Student | | 1.8% | 1 |
| Programmer | | 7.0% | 4 |
| Funding agency representative | 0.0% | 0 | |
| Journal representative | 0.0% | 0 | |
| Teacher | 0.0% | 0 | |
 Other (please specify) | | 5.3% | 3 |
| answered question | 57 | ||
| skipped question | 1 | ||
| 2. How satisfied were you with: | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 very satisfied | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 not satisfied | N/A | Rating Average | Response Count | |
| meeting overall? | 67.2% (39) | 22.4% (13) | 6.9% (4) | 3.4% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 1.47 | 58 |
| quality of talks? | 37.9% (22) | 46.6% (27) | 13.8% (8) | 0.0% (0) | 1.7% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 1.81 | 58 |
| quality of posters? | 41.4% (24) | 36.2% (21) | 13.8% (8) | 5.2% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 3.4% (2) | 1.82 | 58 |
| quality of food and housing? | 63.8% (37) | 24.1% (14) | 5.2% (3) | 3.4% (2) | 3.4% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 1.59 | 58 |
| venue for presentation? | 51.7% (30) | 36.2% (21) | 10.3% (6) | 1.7% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 1.62 | 58 |
| cost of the meeting? | 21.1% (12) | 40.4% (23) | 22.8% (13) | 12.3% (7) | 3.5% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 2.37 | 57 |
| length of the meeting? | 50.9% (29) | 31.6% (18) | 10.5% (6) | 3.5% (2) | 3.5% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 1.77 | 57 |
| dates of the meeting? | 48.3% (28) | 39.7% (23) | 8.6% (5) | 0.0% (0) | 3.4% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 1.71 | 58 |
| answered question | 58 | |||||||
| skipped question | 0 | |||||||
| 3. Was there adequate: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Response Count | |
| balance between posters and talks? | 98.2% (55) | 1.8% (1) | 56 |
| time for discussion for talks? | 69.6% (39) | 30.4% (17) | 56 |
| time for discussion during the meeting? | 73.2% (41) | 26.8% (15) | 56 |
| answered question | 57 | ||
| skipped question | 1 | ||
| 4. Please indicate the quality/usefulness of the following sessions and workshops: | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 most useful | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 least useful | Did not attend | Rating Average | Response Count | |
| Literature Collection and Curation | 38.6% (22) | 36.8% (21) | 7.0% (4) | 1.8% (1) | 3.5% (2) | 12.3% (7) | 1.80 | 57 |
| Genome Sequence Annotation and Comparative Genomics | 24.1% (14) | 37.9% (22) | 20.7% (12) | 5.2% (3) | 3.4% (2) | 8.6% (5) | 2.19 | 58 |
| Genome Annotation Workshop | 15.8% (9) | 14.0% (8) | 3.5% (2) | 7.0% (4) | 3.5% (2) | 56.1% (32) | 2.28 | 57 |
| Curation Standards and Best Curation Practices Workshop | 42.1% (24) | 26.3% (15) | 8.8% (5) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 22.8% (13) | 1.57 | 57 |
| Ontology Development | 20.7% (12) | 29.3% (17) | 29.3% (17) | 10.3% (6) | 1.7% (1) | 8.6% (5) | 2.38 | 58 |
| Functional Genomics Data Curation | 16.1% (9) | 44.6% (25) | 26.8% (15) | 3.6% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 8.9% (5) | 2.20 | 56 |
| Collaboration Between Journal Publishers and Database Curators Workshop | 53.4% (31) | 12.1% (7) | 5.2% (3) | 1.7% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 27.6% (16) | 1.38 | 58 |
| Best Practices in Ontology Development Workshop | 21.1% (12) | 22.8% (13) | 8.8% (5) | 1.8% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 45.6% (26) | 1.84 | 57 |
| Community Curation | 38.6% (22) | 36.8% (21) | 15.8% (9) | 1.8% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 7.0% (4) | 1.79 | 57 |
| Training/Professional Development Posters | 20.0% (11) | 25.5% (14) | 23.6% (13) | 9.1% (5) | 3.6% (2) | 18.2% (10) | 2.40 | 55 |
| Database Tools Posters | 19.3% (11) | 49.1% (28) | 12.3% (7) | 8.8% (5) | 0.0% (0) | 10.5% (6) | 2.12 | 57 |
| answered question | 58 | |||||||
| skipped question | 0 | |||||||
| 5. Please indicate the level of your interest in the following sessions and workshops: | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 most interesting | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 least interesting | Rating Average | Response Count | |
| Literature Collection and Curation | 59.6% (34) | 19.3% (11) | 17.5% (10) | 0.0% (0) | 3.5% (2) | 1.68 | 57 |
| Genome Sequence Annotation and Comparative Genomics | 33.3% (19) | 29.8% (17) | 24.6% (14) | 7.0% (4) | 5.3% (3) | 2.21 | 57 |
| Genome Annotation Workshop | 21.4% (12) | 14.3% (8) | 39.3% (22) | 10.7% (6) | 14.3% (8) | 2.82 | 56 |
| Curation Standards and Best Curation Practices Workshop | 66.7% (38) | 12.3% (7) | 14.0% (8) | 5.3% (3) | 1.8% (1) | 1.63 | 57 |
| Ontology Development | 36.8% (21) | 29.8% (17) | 22.8% (13) | 5.3% (3) | 5.3% (3) | 2.12 | 57 |
| Functional Genomics Data Curation | 32.1% (18) | 39.3% (22) | 23.2% (13) | 5.4% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 2.02 | 56 |
| Collaboration Between Journal Publishers and Database Curators Workshop | 74.1% (43) | 13.8% (8) | 5.2% (3) | 6.9% (4) | 0.0% (0) | 1.45 | 58 |
| Best Practices in Ontology Development Workshop | 31.6% (18) | 29.8% (17) | 22.8% (13) | 8.8% (5) | 7.0% (4) | 2.30 | 57 |
| Community Curation | 53.6% (30) | 35.7% (20) | 5.4% (3) | 5.4% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 1.63 | 56 |
| Training/Professional Development Posters | 19.6% (11) | 32.1% (18) | 26.8% (15) | 16.1% (9) | 5.4% (3) | 2.55 | 56 |
| Database Tools Posters | 32.7% (18) | 40.0% (22) | 20.0% (11) | 7.3% (4) | 0.0% (0) | 2.02 | 55 |
| answered question | 58 | ||||||
| skipped question | 0 | ||||||
| 6. How effective did you find the following workshop formats: | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 most effective | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 least effective | Rating Average | Response Count | |
| entire workshop presented by one person | 13.3% (6) | 26.7% (12) | 24.4% (11) | 8.9% (4) | 26.7% (12) | 3.09 | 45 |
| multiple short talks format for workshops | 29.1% (16) | 49.1% (27) | 10.9% (6) | 7.3% (4) | 3.6% (2) | 2.07 | 55 |
| short talks followed by panel/group discussion | 65.4% (34) | 23.1% (12) | 9.6% (5) | 0.0% (0) | 1.9% (1) | 1.50 | 52 |
| I would prefer another format: | 7 | ||||||
| answered question | 57 | ||||||
| skipped question | 1 | ||||||
| 7. How did you hear about this meeting? (Choose all that apply) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| E-mail notification | | 64.3% | 36 |
| Website | | 25.0% | 14 |
| Journal article | | 1.8% | 1 |
| Other (please specify) | | 30.4% | 17 |
| answered question | 56 | ||
| skipped question | 2 | ||
| 8. Would you come to a future meeting? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | | 89.7% | 52 |
| Maybe | | 10.3% | 6 |
| No (Reasons:) | 0.0% | 0 | |
| answered question | 58 | ||
| skipped question | 0 | ||
| 9. Which of the following day-long workshops (to be held the day before or after the future biocuration meeting) would be most useful to you? | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 most useful | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 least useful | Rating Average | Response Count | |
| GO annotation methods and annotation consistency | 22.2% (12) | 27.8% (15) | 27.8% (15) | 11.1% (6) | 11.1% (6) | 2.61 | 54 |
| Database tools demonstrations and applications | 46.4% (26) | 26.8% (15) | 10.7% (6) | 12.5% (7) | 3.6% (2) | 2.00 | 56 |
| Fundamentals of ontology building and applications of ontologies | 24.5% (13) | 32.1% (17) | 18.9% (10) | 15.1% (8) | 9.4% (5) | 2.53 | 53 |
| Phylogenet analysis and/or orthology determination methods | 35.2% (19) | 25.9% (14) | 18.5% (10) | 13.0% (7) | 7.4% (4) | 2.31 | 54 |
| SQL (Structured Query Language) and Script writing 101 | 36.4% (20) | 10.9% (6) | 18.2% (10) | 14.5% (8) | 20.0% (11) | 2.71 | 55 |
| Methods for searching/storing/compiling literature | 56.4% (31) | 25.5% (14) | 12.7% (7) | 5.5% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 1.67 | 55 |
| Other (please specify) | 5 | ||||||
| answered question | 57 | ||||||
| skipped question | 1 | ||||||
| 10. Please add any comments or suggestions here. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Response Count | ||
| 25 | |
| answered question | 25 | |
| skipped question | 33 | |